Why Test Automation
Why Test Automation
In software
industry nowadays, it is a challenge for any company to continuously maintain
and improve the quality and efficiency of software systems development. In
many software projects, testing is not happening to a sufficient level due
to time or cost constraints. This leads to lack of product quality,
followed by customer dissatisfaction and it ultimately leads to increase
in overall quality costs.
The main
reasons for these added costs are primarily due to:
- Issues
in the test strategy
- effort
of test case generation is not adequately estimated
- development
delays always cost testing time
- subsequent
test maintenance cycles
Test
automation can improve many areas in a software product life cycle. In
addition to the effectiveness of testing, even the accuracy will be higher when
comparing with a manual tester. Therefore, by introducing automation the manual
testers can focus more on business scenarios and let the automation suite to
work on the functional tests. The automation of tests are initially
associated with increased effort most of the time, but the related benefits
will pay off. This is called ‘Return on Investment’.
When Is
Automation Necessary?
Not all projects require automation. When attempting to decide whether the project requires automation, the first thing you need to consider is the efficiency of manual tests and the test coverage of the project. For example; if your project is small, automation testing should not be a requirement since you don’t have resources for specialized testing. However for larger projects, bringing in an automation expert will add an enormous value and advantage to the project. This might be a little costly. Using simple automated scripts instead of manual tests with certain projects that use websites could be both cost and time effective. This would ultimately reduce the time spent on testing as a whole with more accuracy and efficiency.
Not all projects require automation. When attempting to decide whether the project requires automation, the first thing you need to consider is the efficiency of manual tests and the test coverage of the project. For example; if your project is small, automation testing should not be a requirement since you don’t have resources for specialized testing. However for larger projects, bringing in an automation expert will add an enormous value and advantage to the project. This might be a little costly. Using simple automated scripts instead of manual tests with certain projects that use websites could be both cost and time effective. This would ultimately reduce the time spent on testing as a whole with more accuracy and efficiency.
What Automation Testing Can Add to Your
Project
An automation specialist is a highly
skilled person in both automation and quality assurance aspects compared to a
regular tester. He/she would already be an experienced manual tester with
additional automation skills. Bringing in a person with these kinds of skills
would enhance the testing process even more by reducing manual testing hours
and effort spent on writing test cases. Test automation is done based on test
scenarios which can represent multiple test cases. This will increase the
accuracy, quality, coverage and efficiency of tests. Furthermore, the tools and
frameworks you use to achieve automation can become a dependable resource for
larger projects if there is a budget to cover that aspect of testing. Manual
testing should still occur in this process but not for functional tests, manual
testing can be used to test business cases, so our software will be properly
tested both functionality wise and business wise. The proper combination of
automation and manual tests we can always expect a high quality product.
Things to
Consider
·
Cost and Resources: What is your budget and how many resources can
you afford?
·
Stakeholders: The people who are involved in the project?
·
Manageability: What is the scope of the project? Is there a ROI
·
Execution Time: Manual vs. Automation. How much time can you save
with automated tests vs. manual?
The Value of Automation Testing
A lot of projects spend most of their time and effort for the framework and
their features but testing gets a low priority. Even though you use test
automation, still the automation code/scripts don’t get the same priority as the
Main code. This is a wrong practice since the code you use to test should have
a higher priority because finally, the quality of the software is measured with
these automation test results.
The real value of any automated testing
effort is derived from the test results it produces, instead of the quantity of
automated test scripts. Automated tests reduce the testing time as a whole, but
you need to comprehend that they become part of the production code base and
therefore must be maintained just like the rest of the code, for the entire
life cycle of the application. Adding tests that are overly complex or
difficult to maintain can slow down the feedback cycle to the team and
should be avoided
Tools used for Test Automation
Comments
Post a Comment